Good piece absent moralising.

The central question remains: while we must rely upon a monopoly of individual property rights codified in law for for the purpose of juridical decide -ability and therefore rule of law, there is no reason to rely upon a monopoly production of commons, nor a monopoly administration of commons.

There is no need for majority rule. There is no reason for the production of commons to require universal contribution only universal prohibition on fructus and abusus.

The free rider problem is much different from redistribution that produces perverse incentives.